Looking back at our work during the Jigawa floods, I cannot separate what we achieved from the people who made it possible. Sawaba Radio, the Nigerian Red Cross, the Federal Road Safety Corps, volunteers and individual contributors all appeared in my message of appreciation. Alhamdulillah for every person who helped. But gratitude deserves more than a long list of names beneath a group picture. It should help people understand the work that was actually done.
Look beyond the most visible role
The person holding the microphone is easy to remember. Preparation is harder to see. A team may depend on scheduling, translation, phone calls, stock checks, or careful record keeping. These tasks are sometimes treated as background even though the visible activity would be difficult without them. A fair account should notice that relationship.
Specific thanks do not require ranking people. The point is to describe contributions accurately, not to turn appreciation into a competition. A person who gave one afternoon should not be praised for leading the entire project. Equally, someone who carried substantial responsibility should not disappear behind a photograph of more prominent participants.
Ask before making recognition public
Some supporters may welcome a public acknowledgement. Others may prefer privacy. The same applies to volunteers, community members, and people who provided information. Checking their preference is a small act of respect, especially when a public association could carry professional or personal consequences that the organiser does not understand.
Consider a hypothetical neighbourhood clean-up. A short account might recognise the residents who identified the problem, the volunteers who worked, and the office that collected the waste. If an unresolved issue remains, the report can say so. Gratitude does not require pretending that the activity solved every problem or that all arrangements worked perfectly.
There is also value in private appreciation. A message explaining why someone's careful work mattered may be more meaningful than a generic certificate. It gives the recipient evidence that their effort was seen. Managers and organisers should not assume that a public group photograph provides the same recognition as a direct, considered thank-you.
An accurate acknowledgement can become part of an organisation's memory. When another team returns to a similar task, it can identify the kinds of contributions that were necessary and the people who may hold relevant experience. This practical value depends on the account being truthful. Inflated praise obscures the division of work just as surely as failing to recognise it.
Turn appreciation into better working habits
If a team repeatedly relies on one person's unpaid extra effort, thanking them should not become a substitute for changing the arrangement. Appreciation can be followed by a practical discussion about workload, tools, reimbursement where agreed, or clearer responsibilities. Otherwise, praise can begin to reward an unsustainable situation.
Good gratitude is accurate and proportionate. It remembers that shared work is built from different tasks and different levels of visibility. When a project ends, we should ask whether the people reading our account can understand how it was actually carried out. Naming the work fairly honours the people who did it and leaves a more useful record for the next team.
0 Comments